Other prime examples of who were real oppressors of Armenians!..

Other prime examples of who were real oppressors of Armenians!..

Despite Westerners are responsible for far more genocides/extortions of lands/resources, enslavement of many native/aboriginal people, they use their third reich senates, crook journalists to blame non-Westerners for dire events which are either made up or engineered as ruses to liberate (i.e. invade and steal the natural resources of) other non-western nations. This selective blindness of westerners enable them to justify their supposedly democratic sugar coated fascistic rules all around the world.

The following correspondence, though making reference to certain parts of Anatolia as Kurdistan, totally omitting the facts that Kurds were (and still are) nomadic people who did not have their land (until deportation of Armenians) and there is a significant amount of Turks in the region, sheds further light on who were real oppressors of Armenians in the region.

Since they were nomadic they were also mostly AWOL from military service, so they could continue their plundering, raping and robbing actions unhindered.

Despite not a single official document accuses any Turk of killing Armenian even for personal reasons, why all social Darwinist Western senates  (despite they are Forum non conveniens) deliver verdicts of genocide on Turks and current Republic of Turkey for dire events which they instigated in the first place and perpetrated by nomadic Kurds?

Please read your self and let the truth be told.

No More Discrimination

No. 224

Sir A. H. Layard to the Marquis of Salisbury.

No. 6o8.

My Lord,

THERAPIA, July 12, 1879. (Received July 22.)

WITH reference to Major Trotter’s despatch of the 28th ultimo, a copy of which is forwarded to your Lordship by this messenger, I have the honour to inclose copy of a note verbale I have addressed to the Porte, calling attention to the outrages to which the Armenians of the district of Gonig are subjected, and urging that the most rigorous measures should be taken for the protection of the Sultan’s Armenian subjects in Kurdistan.

I have, &c.

(Signed) A. H. LAVARD.

F. O. p424/85, p. 204, js 362
Turkey No. 10 (1879), p. 1o6, No. 64

Inclosure in No. 224

Note Verbale.

HER Majesty’s Ambassador desires to submit to the Sublime Porte a statement relating to the oppression and outrages to which the Armenians of the village of Ognoa, in the district of Gonig, in Kurdistan, are subjected by Kurdish Chiefs. Her Majesty’s Ambassador is aware that the facts mentioned in it have been brought to the notice of the Commission sent by the Imperial Government to enquire in to the condition of the vilayet of Erzeroum and the neighbouring districts, and he cannot doubt but that the Commissioners, anxious to perform the mission confided to them in a just, impartial, and energetic manner, will take measures to ensure redress and protection to the inhabitants of Ognoa. The state of things existing in this village unhappily appears to prevail over a great part of the east of Anatolia, comprised in what is called Kurdistan. The object of Her Majesty’s Ambassador in calling the special notice of the Sublime Porte to it is to draw its earnest attention to the intolerable oppression under which the Armenian subjects of the Sultan are suffering, in the hope that the most rigorous measures will be adopted to carry out the intentions and promises of His Imperial Majesty, that all his subjects, without distinction of race or creed, shall be placed on a footing of perfect equality, and shall receive his protection. It would unhappily, appear that the only authority now existing in those districts, to which Her Majesty’s Ambassador has referred, is that of Kurdish Agas and Beys, who exercise it in plundering, outraging, and oppressing the unfortunate Christians under their rule.

A.H.L.

Therapia, July 9, 1879.

F. 0. 424/85, pp. 204-205, JVo. 362/1

Turkey J’To. 10 (1879), pp. 106-107, .No. 64/I

Strange but Armenians are victims of Kurdish excesses again and no Turks are named

Strange but Armenians are victims of Kurdish excesses again and no Turks are named

Despite there is no physical evidence but all hearsay claims about Turks, who after living together side by side with Armenians for almost a millennium, started slaughtering Armenians out of blue, with no sign of previous hostility, Dashnak (Nazi) Armenians and western imperialist puppet masters behind them opt to blame ethnic Turks for dire events caused by lawless Kurds and triggered by Armenian rebellious movements.

And our Western friends (sic) and allies (sic) in the dens of vipers they call parliaments are adopting verdicts that Turks killed 1.5 million Armenians during an operation which can be designated as a genocide.

Although, these vipers are so myopic to see that European imperialists killed several hundreds of millions of Black people (to steal their resources) and other Asiatic people and Americans (both South and North) killed 10 ton 100 million native Americans (of which nobody knows the exact numbers, since nobody cares) Western dens of vipers they call parliaments are engaged in acting as extraordinary courts and delivering guilty verdicts to ethnic Turks.

Anyway the following correspondence which is written by a Major Trotter, whom, according to Dashnak philosophy and the western puppet masters behind them, shall call a Turk, a Turkish agent, a Georgian, a self-hating Jew (sic), or a denialist who received blood money from Turks for denying the first and established (sic) genocide of 20^th century, sheds some further light upon the circumstances of the eastern Anatolia.

Please read yourself and let the truth be told.

No More Discrimination

No. 214

Major Trotter to the Marquis of Salisbury.

(Extract.)

ERZEROUM, June 21, 1879. (Received July 11)

THE Imperial Commission has not made very marked progress with the work of reform during the past week; much of its time has been taken up in discussing the somewhat pressing matters of the revolts in Dersim and amongst the Moaki Kurds. Progress has been made in discussing the details of the proposed gendarmerie, and the Commissioners’ proposals will probably be sent for submission to the Porte by the next mail.

The question of substituting a fixed cash payment in lieu of the existing system of tithes has also been under consideration, and statistics are being prepared in connection therewith. Yusuf Pasha, the first Commissioner, appears to be keen upon introducing this much-wanted reform. The provincial budget has also been dipped into with a view of making proposals to the Porte that a certain fixed percentage of the revenue shall be absolutely set aside for provincial purposes, the balance only to be remitted to Constantinople.

In a despatch to Her Majesty’s Ambassador I estimated the Kurdish (Kizzil bash) population of the Dersim at from 1oo,ooo to 150,000 souls. This was based on an old report of a former Consul. I learn, however, from the Imperial Commissioners, that the Official records of the vilayet give a total of 18,323 Kurdish males and 2,529 Armenians, so that the population of the whole district may, perhaps, not exceed 40,000. The inhabitants of the north-eastern cazas of Kuzujan, about one-third of the total population, are said to be quiet, and the present military proceedings are directed against the remaining two-thirds in the west and south cazas of Owajik and Mazgird. Dervish Pasha has more than thirty battalions at his disposal.

Of the disturbances amongst the Moaki Kurds who inhabit the mountains west of Bitlis and south of Mush we have only a telegraphic communication from the Pasha of Van, to the effect that two of the principal Chiefs have been fighting amongst themselves, and that the Rayahs, and especially the Christians, have been suffering in consequence. Several of the latter have, I believe, been killed. The Pasha had sent officials to try and arrange the matter peacefully, but the mission had utterly failed in the attempt, and its authority was ignored, and the Governor sought permission from the Imperial Commissioners to send troops against the rebels. This matter has also been referred to Constantinople for decision, and the Governor of Van has been requested to give details as to the number of troops at his disposal, and as to the powers of resistance of the insurgents. The Commissioners, with whom I concur, desire to suppress the disturbance with the aid of the military before the revolt shall assume larger dimensions.

The subject of financial arrangements will probably shortly occupy a special despatch.

I am tired of reiterating the same thing, but as long as soldiers are some four years in arrears of pay, and the zaptiehs for two years, the Turkish Empire cannot be said to be in a state of security. It is ridiculous to talk of introducing a new gendarmerie until arrangements be made for their regular payment, and of that fact the Commissioners are as well aware as I am.

Turkey .No. 10 (1879), p. 104, .No. 61

Iesus autem dixit ei Iuda osculo Filium hominis tradis

Iesus autem dixit ei Iuda osculo Filium hominis tradis

(But Jesus said unto him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of Man with a kiss?)

Despite Armenians, being Millet-i Sidika (Loyal Nation) of Ottoman Empire, had the most valuable government posts without having to convert to Islam and they (together with other non-Moslems) were dominant with landslide in trade and arts and despite many British, Russian (both Tsarist and Soviet) documents clearly indicate there is no hostility between Armenians and ethnic Turks but with Kurds, who were (and mostly still are) landless, nomadic tribes, who live on animal breeding and if opportunity shows, by robbing sedentary people (mostly like Armenians and sometimes Turks, who have their own land) the Armenian clergy, (who are mostly of Russian origin) though pretending to have a divinity, were continuously intriguing against the people who granted the Armenians of Ottoman Empire the most juicy posts and trades of the entire empire.

The following British Document clearly indicates the Armenian clergy's double talks and double plays, in line with the Armenian revolutionaries from Russia.

While Moslems (Turks, or Mussulmans as they call it) were living mostly in poverty, they were getting the lion's share from the empire's economic and political resources but also intriguing against and undermining the Empire, just like, Judas Iscariot, who while eating on the table of Jesus Christ, was betraying Him.

While his Beatutide Narses was trying to brownnose Mr. Layard, he was caught in flagrante delicto of His double talk. Since he previously sent some letters accusing British Consular Functionaries of reluctance to help Armenians and Mussulmans, He was clearly confronted by a British Consular Functionary, who was offended by these double talks.

Most important of all, Mr. Layard, clearly warns Armenian Patriarch not to get involved in any intrigues which shall finally bring disaster to them by saying “But, I added, his Beatitude must not expect me to take part in any intrigues for upsetting the present political condition of Western Asia, and for undermining the authority of the Sultan. I warned him that such intrigues could only tend to bring misfortune upon the Armenians themselves”.

Anyway read yourself and let the truth be told.

No More Discrimination.

No. 213

Sir A. H. Layard to the Marquis of Salisbury.

No. 535.

My Lord,

THERAPIA, June 21, 1879. (Received June 30.)

THE Armenian Patriarch, Archbishop Nerses, told me yesterday, when I was calling upon him, that, at a meeting held that day by the Commission of Notables charged with the administration of the affairs of the Armenian community, a unanimous vote of thanks had been passed to me for the services I had rendered to the Armenians, through my representations in their favour to the Porte. I availed myself of the occasion to ask his Beatitude what he meant by stating in his letter to Mr. Malet, of which a copy was forwarded to your Lordship in his despatch No. 370 of the 3rd ultimo, that “the Armenians had rarely had the happiness to see in the East Representatives of the English Government animated with a sincere desire to use their influence for the amelioration of the lot of the Christian and Mussulman populations of the Empire.” I considered such a statement, I said, a most unjust and unfounded reflection upon Her Majesty’s Representatives, and I should be glad to hear to whom he particularly alluded. I had never heard, I observed, of an English Representative in the East who was indifferent to the happiness and welfare of the Christian and Mussulman subjects of the Sultan. On the contrary, the influence of England had always been exercised in their behalf, and I had no hesitation in saying that the Christians of Turkey, without distinction of creed, owed more to it than to that of any other nation. His Beatitude, I added, would always find me ready to do all in my power to obtain justice and good government for the Armenians, as well as for all other Christians in the Turkish Empire, and to use my utmost endeavours to that end. In doing so, I was not only acting upon my own convictions, but carrying out the policy of Her Majesty’s Government. But, I added, his Beatitude must not expect me to take part in any intrigues for upsetting the present political condition of Western Asia, and for undermining the authority of the Sultan. I warned him that such intrigues could only tend to bring misfortune upon the Armenians themselves, and that, if he really desired the happiness and welfare of the community, he should use all legitimate means to obtain good and just government for the Armenians, in which he would have my entire support, instead of endeavouring to carry out wild and impracticable schemes.

His Beatitude observed that he had meant nothing by the expression in his letter to Mr. Malet, to which I had referred, that the Armenians would be for ever grateful to England for what she had done for them, and that he had no cause to complain of indifference on the part of Her Majesty’s Representatives to the interests of his community.

I thought it as well to speak thus plainly to his Beatitude, as I have every reason to believe that there are persons, having influence over him, who are endeavouring to draw him into intrigues, which are certainly not calculated to promote the true interests of the Armenians, but which may, on the contrary, have the effect of retarding, instead of promoting, the reforms and the just and good administration that is the desire and object of Her Majesty’s Government to see introduced into the Asiatic dominions of the Sultan.

I have, &c.

(Signed) A. H. LAYARD.

F. 0. 424/84, p. 387 - 388, No. 486

Armenian Clergy Plays Part of Judas Iscariot

Armenian Clergy Plays Part of Judas Iscariot

The Dashnak (Nazi) Armenians and their western patrons who blame ethnic Turks out of all ethnic groups of Ottoman Empire and Republic of Turkey which was established in 1923 for dire events which took place in 1915, arising out of massacres staged by Kurds on Armenians for stealing their land and their wives for more than a half century. Despite both Dashnaks (Nazis) and their Turcophobe western masters lack the material evidence incriminating Turks, such as non-existence of concentration camps, mass graves, which are telltale signs of a genocide. This is petitio principii on the part of racist west, who took every measure to discriminate against Turks.

Moreover, while Dashnak Armenians managed to cleanse Turks who are settled people, whose fathers and sons were off to war, thus consisting only women and children, thus sitting duck for Armenian Dashnak terrorists, decimating their numbers to (now) a minority, it was Kurds who benefited from demise of Turks, by stealing the women and land of the Armenians, on whom they staged depredation attacks, before and during deportation of Armenian population for a period of almost half a century. Dashnak (Nazi) Armenian terrorists would be unable to do anything against Kurds, since they are nomadic people, mostly hiding in the mountains, whose men were AWOL from military service, armed to the teeth, unlike Turkish families whose fathers and sons were off to War to defend their country.

And in Ottoman Empire, though, denominated as a Turkish one, administrative ranks were occupied by non-Turks, called devshirmes, i.e. converts, who get into Sultan's service and ethnic Turks were rural people, who were mostly engaged in agriculture. And Armenians, being skillful in trade, arts and crafts, were the crown jewel of Ottoman administrative ranks, though being “millet-i sidika (i.e. loyal nation)” they do not have to convert to Islam, while being in state service.

Apart from the fact that they were favored in imperial service, they were in a good condition in civilian life too, because they were tradesmen and craftsmen, domains where ethnic Turks were almost non-present, as documented by many British Documents, published here.

And in this favorable environment, it was Armenian priests of Russian Origin, who stirred sedition amongst Armenian population, to attain an utopian Big Armenia, where they were only 7 percent of the population, which they attempted to attain by staging ethnic cleansing campaigns on sedentary people (who happens to be Turks), in return their civilian population being oppressed, robbed, killed and raped by tribalistic Kurdish bandits for almost half a century.

The following document clearly states that Mussulmans (from Roumelia, which are actually Turks) would be a check upon the Kurds.

Anyway read yourself and let the truth be told.

No More Discrimination

No. 211

Sir A. H. Layard to the Marquis of Salisbury.

No. 531.

My Lord,

THERAPIA, June 21, 1879. (Received June 30.)

I HAVE the honour to inclose copy of a letter addressed to me by Monseigneur Nerses, the Armenian Patriarch, complaining that the Porte was about to sent 4,000 refugee families from Roumelia to the district of Moush, in Armenia. I understand that his Beatitude has sent a similar letter to several of my colleagues.

When calling yesterday on his Beatitude, I asked him to give me some details with respect to his letter. Were the families to which it referred Mussulman families? Did they really come from Roumelia? Were they Circassians? From whence did he obtain his information? And on what ground did he object to the settlement in a district like Moush of quiet and industrious people, although Mussulmans, who would be a check upon the Kurds? His Beatitude could not give me any satisfactory answers to my questions, and appeared to know little or nothing about the matter. He sent for his Secretary to explain his letter. That gentleman said that rumours had reached the Patriarchate of the intention of the Porte to send these families, who, he presumed, were composed of Mussulmans, to Moush, and that consequently the Patriarch had addressed the Embassies on the subject. He knew nothing more. I told his Beatitude that, without being furnished with more exact and trustworthy information, I could not address any representations to the Porte; but that if he would give me full particulars, I would take such steps in the matter as I properly could. In the meanwhile I will forward a copy of his Beatitude’s letter to Major Trotter for a report.

His Beatitude is in the habit of sending complaints of this kind to the foreign Embassies, with the object, I have every reason to believe, of getting up an “Armenian question.” They frequently contain very exaggerated, if not unfounded, statements.

I have, &c.

(Signed) A. H. LAYARD.

F. 0. 424/84, . 385, 1o. 483

Inclosure in No. 211

Monsignor Nerses to Sir A. H. Lqyard.

M. l’Ambassadeur,

AYANT appris que Ic Gouvernement Imperial a projete d’envoyer ,ooo families emigrécs de Roumélie dans le district de Moush, en Arménie, je prends la liberté d’avoir recours a la puissante intervention de votre Excellence pour épargner a la maiheureuse population Chrétienne de ce district de nouvelles et de cruelles épreuves.

Votre Excellence n’ignore pas qu’une contrée aussi désolée ne saurait offrir les ressources nécessaires pour l’entretien d’une nombreuse colonie. Elle sait de plus que ces émigrés de Roumélie sont rien moms qu’ennemis de l’ordre et du progrès; que les Arméniens souffrent déjà trop de l’oppression des Kurdes, et que Ia presence d’un nouvel élément de désordre et de perturbation les pousserait au désespoir.

Si rien ne se fait, Excellence, pour empécher le mal qui existe, on peut au moms, croyons-nous, éviter ce qui peut aggraver Ia situation, en renouvelant ces déplorables scenes qui ont si vivement ému le public en Europe.

J’ai, &c.

(Signe) NERSES.

F. 0. 424 / 84, / 386, .No. 483

Innocent (sic) Armenians oppressing the other Christians

Innocent (sic) Armenians oppressing the other Christians

As modus operandi of Dashnak (Nazi) Armenians to demonize Turks (out of all ethnic groups of Ottomans) and create a discriminatory environment for Turks (of course, with the bona fide (sic) support of parliaments and government of our western friends (sic) and allies (sic)), Dashnaks played the innocent, pretending that they have been murdered out of blue, falsely representing the massacres which were mostly staged on them by KURDS, as genocide.

Let's look at what British Foreign Office says about their myth of innocence.

So read yourself and let the truth be told.

No More Discrimination

No. 200

Sir A. H. Layard to the Marquis of Salisbury.

No. 433.

My Lord,

THERAPIA, May 24, 1879. (Received June 6.)

MAJOR TROTTER, in his despatch to me of the 16th ultimo, copy of which was transmitted by him to your Lordship, having called my attention to the ill- treatment of Protestants in the Vilayet of Diarbekir by other Christian sects, and especially by the Orthodox Armenians, I directed Dragoman Marinich to bring the matter to the notice of the Armenian Patriarch, and to warn his Beatitude that he could not expect me to countenance acts of religious persecution committed either by Mussulmans or Christians, and to intercede with the Porte on behalf of the Armenians when they had cause for complaint if they were guilty of oppressing and persecuting their fellow-Christians. I have the honour to inclose copy of a Memorandum from Mr. Marinich, reporting the steps that he had taken in the matter.

I have, &c.

Turkey No. 10 (1879), p. 78, No 40

(Signed) A. H. LAYARD

F. O. 424/84, p. 55, No. 92

Inclosure in No. 200

M. Marinicli to Sir A. H. Layard.

M. l’Ambassadeur,

PERA, le 23 Mai 1879.

SUIVANT les instructions de votre Excellence, je me suis rendu chez le CaImacam du Patriarche Arménien démissionaire, pour me plaindre des mauvais traitements auxquels sont victimes les Protestants dans le district de Sert, ainsi que le rapporte M. le Major Trotter, dans sa dépêche, en date du i6 Avril dernier.

Je n’ai pas manqué de faire ressortir toutes les consequences fâcheuses auxquelles peut facilement donner lieu une telle persecution.J’ai eu soin d’ajouter que si cet état de choses continuait, qu’il ne fallait pas s’attendre a voir votre Excellence intervenir désormais en faveur des Arméniens lorsque ceux-ci seraient l’objet de mauvais traitements comme ceux qu’ils font subir a leurs frères les Protestants; j’ai conclu en disant que votre Excellence était fermement persuadée que le Patriarcat, ne tolerant pas cette persecution religieuse, se serait empressé de transmettre des ordres a ses autorités religieuses dans le Vilayet de Diarbékir, afin que l’on mette un terme a ces faits regrettables.

Le CaImacam du Patriarche Arménien s’est montré très-peiné d’apprendre le récit queje lui ai fait. Ii m’a prié d’informer votre Excellence qu’il se fera un devoir de transmettre par le courrier prochain les ordres les plus formels a ces autorités ecclesiastiques dans le Vilayet de Diarbékir pour que désormais les Arméniens ne se livrent plus a des actes repréhensibles qu’il considère comme contraire au Christianisme ainsi qu’à l’esprit d’humanité et de civilisation du siècle oü nous vivons. Toutefois, comme les faits rapportés par le Major Trotter n’ont pas eu lieu dans les villes, mais se sont produits dans les campagnes par des individus sans education, il ne faudrait pas, m’a dit le Caimacam du Patriarche, faire retomber l’odieux de ces actes isolés sur toute la nation Arménienne, qui desire vivre en parfaite harmonie avec les Protestants. Aussi, il prie instamment votre Excellence de vouloir bien continuer comme par le passé a protéger et défendre les intérêts des Arméniens. Le Patriarcat de son côté ne manquera pas de donner les instructions nécessaires pour qu’à l’avenir de pareils faits ne se renouvellent plus. LeCaImacam du Patriarche m’a fait remarquer que l’Evêque de Diarbékir s’était empressé, comme le dit du reste le Major Trotter, de recommander a ses ouailles d’éviter les conflits religieux avec les Protestants, conflits que dans l’état actuel de choses, a dit le CaImacam, ne manqueraient pas de produire de funestes effets sur l’esprit des Mussulmans, qui se sentiraient autorisés a exercer aussi de leur côté des actes d’oppression et d’injustice envers les Chrétiens.

En même temps, j’ai informé le CaImacam du Patriarche que la nommée Anna, qui avait été mariée précédemment a tin Protestant, continuait, contrairement aux ordres catégoriques et péremptoires du Patriarcat, a vivre dans la maison de l’individu avec lequel l’Evêque du Diarbékir l’avait remariée illégalement.

Le CaImacam du Patriarche m’a donné lecture du telegramme qu’il venait de recevoir de l’Evêque Philipos, dans laquelle ii est dit que la susdite Anna avait été séparée de son second man Casandjian, et placée dans Ia maison da sa mere. Mais comme Casandjian, en dépit de la defense des autorités ecclésiastiques, allait de temps en temps la voir, l’Evêque Philipos informait le Patriarcat qu’il se proposait de recourir a l’intervention de l’autorité locale pour empêcher Casandjian de frequenter la maison de sa belle-mere.

J’ai, &c.

(Signe) HUGO MARINICH.

F. O. 424 / 84, p. 55-56, No. 92 / I

Turkey No. 10 (1879), p. 79, .No. 40/1

British Foreign Office's Observations with Respect to Special Commission which inquires Armenian Grievances

British Foreign Office's Observations with Respect to Special Commission which inquires Armenian Grievances

While Turcophobe imperialist/Nazi tugs who happen to be members of the parliaments of our western friends (sic) and allies (sic) are adopting in unison Armenian Genocide verdicts, as special courts, accusing Turks and Republic of Turkey for dire events which happened during Ottoman Era in 1915, well before birth of Republic of Turkey in 1923. involving rebellion of Dashnak (Nazi) Armenians in Anatolia upon instigation of Tsarist Russia, to cleanse non-Armenians therein, so they were no longer a minority (they represented 7% of the population), and get a hold of their historic Armenia, their deportation, of which decree was adopted by an Ottoman Cabinet of Ministers, consisting of entirely non-Turks (i.e. Sabetayists (a.k.a. Sabbatians) and Armenians), which deportation was being implemented by Commanders of Ottoman Army who happened to be Germans, and convoys of deportees were being attacked by Kurdish Bandits, who, as many British Documents and other sources indicate, are real persecutors, rapists and murderers of Anatolian Armenians.

Actually parliamentary Nazis of West must also award verdicts of guilt for sentencing and implicating ethnic Turks for murder of Abel by Cain; many massacres of ancient Canaanites by Israelite; all people enslaved and murdered by Rome; the ill treated and exploited denizens of all colonies (which still happen to exist today!...) who are colonized by good, lovely, freedom loving and caring Westerners who still have the good and Christian-like (???) habit of bringing freedoms and democracy to non-Westerners by killing them en masse, stealing their natural resources; the natives of both South and North America, whose death toll is estimated to be around 10 to 100 million, who have also been liberated and whose lands and natural resources have been stolen by good, democratic and freedom-loving Westerners, being killed by the virtue of the motto “the Best Indian is Dead Indian”; a few million victims of civil war instigated by United States of America for separating Panama from Colombia by supporting freedom fighters (a variant of terrorists who are pro-Western, just like Dashnak (Nazi) terrorists were and now PKK terrorists are to western imperialists); 2.5 million dead Phillipinos who were also liberated by United States of American for bringing freedoms and democracy thereto on the motto of “best Phillipino is dead Phillipino”; 5 million civilians who were liberated by firebombing them during WWII and 1.5 million Japanese civilians who died instantly and further several millions who suffered and died later due to radiation induced cancer and birth defects upon liberation of Japan through use of Weapons of Mass Destruction, i.e. Atomic Bombs by United States of America, which is THE FIRST AND ONLY EXAMPLE OF USING A WEAPON OF MASS DESTRUCTION ON CIVILIANS; 6 million Jews and other undesirables by Nazi Europe (Nazi Germany is a wrong term: entire Europe was Nazi back then); 1 million North Koreans who were attempted to be liberated by Western Imperialists (which were supported by Republic of Turkey, by sending troops), by convincing them using napalm attacks and still being attempted to be liberated by using embargo, if not bombs in violation of self-determination right; 2.5 million Algerians murdered and many more tortured, raped i.e. processed by French in Algeria, to liberate them and bring democracy and freedoms; several million Vietnamese victims of Vietnam war who happened to be napalmed for their liberation; several million victims of Western (especially CIA) sponsored coups staged in many countries from Latin America to Turkey, from Ukraine and Iran to South East Asia; 1.5 million Iraqi civilians who were bombed to death by our Western friends (sic) and allies (sic) and 500 thousand Afghan civilians who shared the same fate with Iraqi civilians for the sake of liberation, freedoms and democracy fired from the barrels of Westerners sans their naturals not being stolen; in short for BEING A TURK.

Please use the harshest wording in the bills you adopt in your Reichstagen and employ the worst ill-treatment towards Turks. I beg you, MASSA please whoop me.

Anyway while I was expecting to be punished in the harshest possible manner, let's look what British Consular functionaries who, according to Dashnak (Nazi) thinking, are Turks, Turkish Agents, Georgians, self-hating (sic) Jews and denialists who received blood money from Turks for denying the first established (??) genocide of 20^th Century, tell about the howabouts of Christians in Anatolia under Ottoman Rule.

Strange thing is while I was demanding to be punished for all the above crimes against humanity, British Consular officers were mentioning about a commission consisting of Yussuf Bey Pasha and Serkis Effendi (an Armenian) and “providing security against Circassians and Kurds”.

Alas, I'm just a Turk who must be punished, ill-treated and discriminated against for just being a Turk. My words are worthless.

So read yourself and let the truth be told.

No More Discrimination

No. 197

Sir A. H. Layard to the Marquis of Salisbury.

No. 401.

My Lord,

THERAPIA, May 14 1879. (Received May 23.)

I HAVE the honour to inclose a copy of the instructions which I have addressed to Major Trotter with regard to the Special Commission appointed by the Porte to inquire into the state of the Vilayet of Erzeroum and of the neighbouring districts.

I have, &c.

(Signed) A. H. LAYARD.

F. O. 424/83, p. 390, No. 527

Inclosure in No. 197

Sir A. H. Layard to Major Trotter.

Sir,	THERAPIA, May 12, 1879.

A SPECIAL Commission appointed by the Porte, and consisting of Yussuf Pasha and Serkis Effendi, has started for Erzeroum, to inquire into the state of that vilayet and the neighbouring districts.

Her Majesty’s Government take a special interest in the object of this Commission, as the future of a large part of Asia Minor is likely to be involved in the success of its labours. They have therefore decided that it shall be accompanied by an officer in Her Majesty’s service. Having proposed your name to the Marquis of Salisbury, the choice has met with his Lordship’s approval, and I have to instruct you to join the Commission as soon as possible.

Reasons which I need not enter into have rendered it unadvisable to ask that you should take part officially in the deliberations of the Commission, but you go with the consent and approbation of the Ottoman Government, and the Imperial Commissioners have received verbal instructions to communicate with you freely on the subject of their proceedings.

The instructions to the Commission give it ample power to redress the wrongs under which the populations are suffering. You will, by your independent position, be able to give much assistance in bringing these wrongs to light, and the sufferers will no doubt lay their grievances before you without fear. In this part of your labour I recommend to you caution in believing in statements made to you, and the strictest impartiality, in order to avoid the imputation of favouring Christians, to the detriment of Mussulmans, and the loss of influence which would be occasioned by it.

The duties of the Commission include the drawing up a general scheme of reforms for the districts which you will visit. If you have any influence over the preparation of this scheme you will use it to obtain equal justice for all classes and denominations of the Sultan’s subjects, for an appropriate distribution of taxation, and for police organization, which shall render the country secure for travellers and inhabitants. You will bear in mind that Her Majesty’s Government desire above all to consolidate the Empire under the dominion of the Sultan, knowing that the means to attain this end are the welfare and prosperity of his people.

You will report frequently by letter and telegraph with Her Majesty’s Embassy.

I am, &c.

(Signed) A. H. LAYARD.

F. O. 424/83, p. 390, .NO. 527/1

No. 198

The Marquis of Salisbury to Sir A. H. Layard.

Sir,	FOREIGN OFFICE, May 21, 1879.

I HAVE received from Major Trotter a copy of his despatch to Mr. Malet of the 24 ultimo. In that despatch Major Trotter inquires whether, in his capacity as Her Majesty’s Consul, he has any right to interfere on behalf of oppressed Christian subjects of the Porte, and if so, under what authority.

By Article LXI of the Treaty of Berlin the Porte engages “to carry out, without further delay, the improvements and reforms demanded by local requirements in the provinces inhabited by Armenians, and to guarantee their security against the Circassians and Kurds.”

It further undertakes “to make known the steps taken for this purpose to the Powers, who will superintend their application.”

Further, in Article I of the Convention between Great Britain and Turkey of the 4 June, 1878, the Sultan “promises to England to introduce necessary reforms, to be agreed upon later between the two Powers, into the government, and for the protection of the Christian and other subjects of the Porte” in his Asiatic territories.

Under these two Treaty stipulations the Sultan stands bound not only to promulgate new and improved laws, but actually to carry out reforms in the administration of the provinces situated within the sphere of Major Trotter’s observation. Any proceedings inconsistent with the spirit of that promise furnish an ample ground for remonstrance—by the Consul in the first instance, and afterwards, should occasion arise, by the Ambassador.

Judgment must of course be used, both as to the expediency and the manner of such representations, and great care should be taken not to act upon information the accuracy of which is open to doubt. But, subject to these precautions, Great Britain will spare no diplomatic exertion to obtain good government for the populations of Asiatic Turkey.

Your Excellency is requested to furnish Major Trotter with a copy of this despatch, for his information and guidance.

I am, &c.

(Signed) SALISBURY.

Turkey No. 10 (1879), p. 76, .No. 37

Peaceful (???) Armenians Persecuting Protestant Armenians

Peaceful (???) Armenians Persecuting Protestant Armenians

What kind of lie is this? If you follow my previous posts on the blog, you may very well know I revealed several Turks, Turkish Agents, Georgians, Self Hating (sic) Jews and denialists who received blood money from Turks for denying the first genocide of 20^th century. Again, British Officer Major Trotter, acting in consular functions in Anatolia, who is a Turk, Turkish Agent, Georgian, Self Hating (sic) Jew and denialist, who dared to give reports invalidating Dashnak (Nazi) Armenians' myth of innocence, continues his reports from Anatolia regarding the events over there.

This time Major Trotter reports that peaceful Armenians persecuted Protestant Armenians of their neighborhood. Since Armenians were wealthy people, unlike Turks, they were able to purchase Cadis (Moslem Judges). The strangest of all, despite Protestant Armenians were beaten by Gregorian Armenians, the Cadi, purchased by Armenians, decides against Protestant Armenians and guess what a Moslem Member of the Cadi's court leaves the tribunal in order to not sign such unjust decree.

In addition Major Trotter also mention about how Turkish Aghas oppress Protestant Armenians, but then he states that tribe a situation probably indicating that he is PROBABLY mistaking Kurds for Turks, because Kurds live by tribes not Turks.

Anyway read your self and let the truth be told.

No More Discrimination

No. 190

Major Trotter to the Marquis of Salisbury.

My Lord,

DIARBEKIR, April 19, 1879. (Received May 19.)

I HAVE the honour to forward a copy of my despatch of the 16th April to address of Her Majesty’s Minister Plenipotentiary at Constantinople.

I have, &c.

(Signed) HENRY TROTTER.

Turkey No 10 (1879), p. 73, No. 35

Inclosure in No. 190

Major Trotter to Mr. Malet.

Sir, DIARBEKIR, April i6, 1879.

I HAVE the honour to state that the condition of the vilayet continues tolerably tranquil, but I regret to have to report rather persistent attempts on the part of the Armenians and Jacobites in the Sert Sandjak to take advantage of the comparative quietness of the times to commence systematic persecution of the Protestants.

I have mentioned that Said Pasha, the Mutessarif of Sert, had dispatched a Commissioner to make inquiries into a recent very brutal case of persecution and expulsion of a Protestant family by the Jacobites of the village of A-udh. I have since received another telegram from the Pasha stating that the expelled family had been reinstated in its home, and that the ringleaders in the affair have been arrested and will be punished.

From Redwan, a sub-district of the Sert Sandjak, I have received a petition signed by the head-men of the Chaldaean, Jacobite, and Armenian communities, making charges against the Protestants that they parade the streets blaspheming and abusing the religions of the above mentioned. The petitioners further threatened that if these acts were continued I ought not to be surprised if I shortly heard news of assassinations and disturbances, as it was impossible for the Armenians to live if they continued to suffer such treatment. Shortly after receipt of the above I received a lengthy telegram couched in similar terms, and stating that since my arrival at Diarbekir the protestants had become intolerably overbearing in their behaviour, and that an end must be put to this state of affairs. A duplicate of this telegram was, I have since ascertained, simultaneously sent to the Vali Pasha.

I was not surprised, a day or two later on, to learn that these other Christian sects had been ill-treating the Protestants. It appears, by letters received from Redwan, that a Protestant was invited into the house of an Armenian, and on a religious discussion commencing, the Armenians tried to compel the Protestant to admit the doctrine of the real presence. On his declining to do so, they set upon him and beat him. Another Protestant passing by was invited inside, and he encountered the same treatment. The injured parties went to the Kaimakam to complain, and were told to bring written petition in the morning. In the meanwhile a counter-charge was brought against the two Protestants that they had forcibly entered the Armenian’s house and committed an assault. The Cadi who is said to have been bought over by the Armenians, decided against the Protestants, and sentenced them to several weeks’ imprisonment. The decision and the sentence were manifestly so unjust that a Mahommedan member of the Cadi’s Court left it rather than sign such an unjust decree. The Protestant pastor protested against the sentence, probably with some vigour, and he, too, was condemned to six weeks imprisonment, but the Kaimakam pronounced the latter sentence illegal, and ordered the pastor’s release.

I have had conversations on this affair with the Armenian Bishop of Diarbekir and with M. Boyagian, the Protestant pastor here; and the result has been that I have sent a letter to the MutessarifofSert, begging him to see thatjustice be done in the matter. I have but little doubt but that Said Pasha will take the matter energetically in hand. I have also written two other letters, one to the Protestant community at Redwan, exhorting them to refrain from offensive remarks and from thrusting their religious opinions down the throats of their adversaries; but I have at the same time told them that I had written to the Pasha to see that justice was done to them in the matter, and I trusted the result would be that the prisoners would be released. My other letter was to the signatories of the petition. I pointed out that as they had, amongst other accusations, stated one manifest falsehood, viz., that the Protestants went about crying out that Christ was a simple prophet, I might fairly presume that their other statements were equally unreliable, but I said that my object was to work for all Christians alike, and as a proof of my conciliatory disposition, I had refrained from handling their petition over to the Vali Pasha. Had I done so, they would certainly have been punished, as the document contained illegal threats, but as my object was to bring about peace and concord, I had contented myself with strongly recommending both them and the Protestants to keep the peace one with the other instead of letting their quarrels be a scandal to Christendom, especially in the present very critical state of affairs, when it behoves all Christians to be good friends.

The Armenian Bishop Philippos has also sent to the Armenians conciliatory advice, and Pastor Boyagian has done the same to the Protestants, so if good advice be of any avail in the matter the villagers have had plenty of it, and I hope that the matter will not develop into anything more serious.

From the Midyad Sandjak I have also had unfavourable reports about the condition of the Protestants, but my last advices state that affairs have taken a more promising turn. I have in former despatches narrated how the principal of the Turkish Aghas in the Midyad districts had systematically ill-treated the Protestants, and the only American missionary now at Mardin wrote to me on date 7 April, saying that “the men and some of the women of the Protestant communities had had to flee from the villages of Keferzi and Arnas. At the former place Agha, with a zaptieh, entered the houses and took from the women anything and everything they wished, while at Arnas has so intimidated the Protestants that three families have declared themselves non-Protestants, and the rest have been ordered to follow their example or prepare for war. One man started from Arnas for Keferzi, was overtaken by some of the tribe, beaten, wounded, and left for dead, having been robbed of his gun and knife, but he finally got away to his house. These Protestants are now in Midyad, not daring to return home.”

A letter of later date—10th April—gives a much more favourable account. The Protestant communities had telegraphed to the Vali Pasha in Diarbekir fir protection, and he at once telegraphed orders to the binbashi in command of the troops at Midyad to do what was needful. As a result of this officer’s intervention both the exiled communities have returned to their homes, and the famous — has been so far humbled that he has been to call on Ràji Effendi, the Protestant Vakil at Midyad, and has begged that the latter would overlook the past and come to an understanding for the future, promising that hereafter neither he nor any of his family would give any more trouble. As, however, his brother is said to have started on the folloving day with twenty armed men to attack another village called Batha, the Protestants are still in doubt as to his ultimate intentions.

It is worthy of remark that the cowardly attack on the Midyad mission house — previously fully reported on—occurred two hours after the departure of the Rev. Mr. Andrus, the resident missionary, on a visit to Diarbekir. The present outburst of fanaticism has occurred immediately subsequent to that same gentleman’s departure on a trip to Mosul.

In my despatch of the 14 March I informed your Excellency that the Mutessarif of Mardin had dispatched a certain Daniel Effendi to Midyad on special duty, to make inquiries about the Rev. Mr. Andrus has informed me that the Report prepared, but not yet officially submitted to the Governor, is a fairly impartial and correct one, so there is some prospect that this long pending case may at last be brought to a conclusion.

It is, perhaps, desirable that I should state that the ill-treatment of Protestants in the Sert Sandjak is, as far as I can judge, due to purely religious rancour, whereas in the Midyad district of the Mardin Sandjak the persecution is, as I have had occasion to explain in former despatches, based on political rather than on religious grounds. The authorities in both district appear to be fairly well disposed towards the Protestants.

I have, &c.

(Signed) HENRY TROTTER.

Turkey No 10 (1879), p 73-75, No. 35/1