Iesus autem dixit ei Iuda osculo Filium hominis tradis

Iesus autem dixit ei Iuda osculo Filium hominis tradis

(But Jesus said unto him, Judas, betrayest thou the Son of Man with a kiss?)

Despite Armenians, being Millet-i Sidika (Loyal Nation) of Ottoman Empire, had the most valuable government posts without having to convert to Islam and they (together with other non-Moslems) were dominant with landslide in trade and arts and despite many British, Russian (both Tsarist and Soviet) documents clearly indicate there is no hostility between Armenians and ethnic Turks but with Kurds, who were (and mostly still are) landless, nomadic tribes, who live on animal breeding and if opportunity shows, by robbing sedentary people (mostly like Armenians and sometimes Turks, who have their own land) the Armenian clergy, (who are mostly of Russian origin) though pretending to have a divinity, were continuously intriguing against the people who granted the Armenians of Ottoman Empire the most juicy posts and trades of the entire empire.

The following British Document clearly indicates the Armenian clergy's double talks and double plays, in line with the Armenian revolutionaries from Russia.

While Moslems (Turks, or Mussulmans as they call it) were living mostly in poverty, they were getting the lion's share from the empire's economic and political resources but also intriguing against and undermining the Empire, just like, Judas Iscariot, who while eating on the table of Jesus Christ, was betraying Him.

While his Beatutide Narses was trying to brownnose Mr. Layard, he was caught in flagrante delicto of His double talk. Since he previously sent some letters accusing British Consular Functionaries of reluctance to help Armenians and Mussulmans, He was clearly confronted by a British Consular Functionary, who was offended by these double talks.

Most important of all, Mr. Layard, clearly warns Armenian Patriarch not to get involved in any intrigues which shall finally bring disaster to them by saying “But, I added, his Beatitude must not expect me to take part in any intrigues for upsetting the present political condition of Western Asia, and for undermining the authority of the Sultan. I warned him that such intrigues could only tend to bring misfortune upon the Armenians themselves”.

Anyway read yourself and let the truth be told.

No More Discrimination.

No. 213

Sir A. H. Layard to the Marquis of Salisbury.

No. 535.

My Lord,

THERAPIA, June 21, 1879. (Received June 30.)

THE Armenian Patriarch, Archbishop Nerses, told me yesterday, when I was calling upon him, that, at a meeting held that day by the Commission of Notables charged with the administration of the affairs of the Armenian community, a unanimous vote of thanks had been passed to me for the services I had rendered to the Armenians, through my representations in their favour to the Porte. I availed myself of the occasion to ask his Beatitude what he meant by stating in his letter to Mr. Malet, of which a copy was forwarded to your Lordship in his despatch No. 370 of the 3rd ultimo, that “the Armenians had rarely had the happiness to see in the East Representatives of the English Government animated with a sincere desire to use their influence for the amelioration of the lot of the Christian and Mussulman populations of the Empire.” I considered such a statement, I said, a most unjust and unfounded reflection upon Her Majesty’s Representatives, and I should be glad to hear to whom he particularly alluded. I had never heard, I observed, of an English Representative in the East who was indifferent to the happiness and welfare of the Christian and Mussulman subjects of the Sultan. On the contrary, the influence of England had always been exercised in their behalf, and I had no hesitation in saying that the Christians of Turkey, without distinction of creed, owed more to it than to that of any other nation. His Beatitude, I added, would always find me ready to do all in my power to obtain justice and good government for the Armenians, as well as for all other Christians in the Turkish Empire, and to use my utmost endeavours to that end. In doing so, I was not only acting upon my own convictions, but carrying out the policy of Her Majesty’s Government. But, I added, his Beatitude must not expect me to take part in any intrigues for upsetting the present political condition of Western Asia, and for undermining the authority of the Sultan. I warned him that such intrigues could only tend to bring misfortune upon the Armenians themselves, and that, if he really desired the happiness and welfare of the community, he should use all legitimate means to obtain good and just government for the Armenians, in which he would have my entire support, instead of endeavouring to carry out wild and impracticable schemes.

His Beatitude observed that he had meant nothing by the expression in his letter to Mr. Malet, to which I had referred, that the Armenians would be for ever grateful to England for what she had done for them, and that he had no cause to complain of indifference on the part of Her Majesty’s Representatives to the interests of his community.

I thought it as well to speak thus plainly to his Beatitude, as I have every reason to believe that there are persons, having influence over him, who are endeavouring to draw him into intrigues, which are certainly not calculated to promote the true interests of the Armenians, but which may, on the contrary, have the effect of retarding, instead of promoting, the reforms and the just and good administration that is the desire and object of Her Majesty’s Government to see introduced into the Asiatic dominions of the Sultan.

I have, &c.

(Signed) A. H. LAYARD.

F. 0. 424/84, p. 387 - 388, No. 486

Armenian Clergy Plays Part of Judas Iscariot

Armenian Clergy Plays Part of Judas Iscariot

The Dashnak (Nazi) Armenians and their western patrons who blame ethnic Turks out of all ethnic groups of Ottoman Empire and Republic of Turkey which was established in 1923 for dire events which took place in 1915, arising out of massacres staged by Kurds on Armenians for stealing their land and their wives for more than a half century. Despite both Dashnaks (Nazis) and their Turcophobe western masters lack the material evidence incriminating Turks, such as non-existence of concentration camps, mass graves, which are telltale signs of a genocide. This is petitio principii on the part of racist west, who took every measure to discriminate against Turks.

Moreover, while Dashnak Armenians managed to cleanse Turks who are settled people, whose fathers and sons were off to war, thus consisting only women and children, thus sitting duck for Armenian Dashnak terrorists, decimating their numbers to (now) a minority, it was Kurds who benefited from demise of Turks, by stealing the women and land of the Armenians, on whom they staged depredation attacks, before and during deportation of Armenian population for a period of almost half a century. Dashnak (Nazi) Armenian terrorists would be unable to do anything against Kurds, since they are nomadic people, mostly hiding in the mountains, whose men were AWOL from military service, armed to the teeth, unlike Turkish families whose fathers and sons were off to War to defend their country.

And in Ottoman Empire, though, denominated as a Turkish one, administrative ranks were occupied by non-Turks, called devshirmes, i.e. converts, who get into Sultan's service and ethnic Turks were rural people, who were mostly engaged in agriculture. And Armenians, being skillful in trade, arts and crafts, were the crown jewel of Ottoman administrative ranks, though being “millet-i sidika (i.e. loyal nation)” they do not have to convert to Islam, while being in state service.

Apart from the fact that they were favored in imperial service, they were in a good condition in civilian life too, because they were tradesmen and craftsmen, domains where ethnic Turks were almost non-present, as documented by many British Documents, published here.

And in this favorable environment, it was Armenian priests of Russian Origin, who stirred sedition amongst Armenian population, to attain an utopian Big Armenia, where they were only 7 percent of the population, which they attempted to attain by staging ethnic cleansing campaigns on sedentary people (who happens to be Turks), in return their civilian population being oppressed, robbed, killed and raped by tribalistic Kurdish bandits for almost half a century.

The following document clearly states that Mussulmans (from Roumelia, which are actually Turks) would be a check upon the Kurds.

Anyway read yourself and let the truth be told.

No More Discrimination

No. 211

Sir A. H. Layard to the Marquis of Salisbury.

No. 531.

My Lord,

THERAPIA, June 21, 1879. (Received June 30.)

I HAVE the honour to inclose copy of a letter addressed to me by Monseigneur Nerses, the Armenian Patriarch, complaining that the Porte was about to sent 4,000 refugee families from Roumelia to the district of Moush, in Armenia. I understand that his Beatitude has sent a similar letter to several of my colleagues.

When calling yesterday on his Beatitude, I asked him to give me some details with respect to his letter. Were the families to which it referred Mussulman families? Did they really come from Roumelia? Were they Circassians? From whence did he obtain his information? And on what ground did he object to the settlement in a district like Moush of quiet and industrious people, although Mussulmans, who would be a check upon the Kurds? His Beatitude could not give me any satisfactory answers to my questions, and appeared to know little or nothing about the matter. He sent for his Secretary to explain his letter. That gentleman said that rumours had reached the Patriarchate of the intention of the Porte to send these families, who, he presumed, were composed of Mussulmans, to Moush, and that consequently the Patriarch had addressed the Embassies on the subject. He knew nothing more. I told his Beatitude that, without being furnished with more exact and trustworthy information, I could not address any representations to the Porte; but that if he would give me full particulars, I would take such steps in the matter as I properly could. In the meanwhile I will forward a copy of his Beatitude’s letter to Major Trotter for a report.

His Beatitude is in the habit of sending complaints of this kind to the foreign Embassies, with the object, I have every reason to believe, of getting up an “Armenian question.” They frequently contain very exaggerated, if not unfounded, statements.

I have, &c.

(Signed) A. H. LAYARD.

F. 0. 424/84, . 385, 1o. 483

Inclosure in No. 211

Monsignor Nerses to Sir A. H. Lqyard.

M. l’Ambassadeur,

AYANT appris que Ic Gouvernement Imperial a projete d’envoyer ,ooo families emigrécs de Roumélie dans le district de Moush, en Arménie, je prends la liberté d’avoir recours a la puissante intervention de votre Excellence pour épargner a la maiheureuse population Chrétienne de ce district de nouvelles et de cruelles épreuves.

Votre Excellence n’ignore pas qu’une contrée aussi désolée ne saurait offrir les ressources nécessaires pour l’entretien d’une nombreuse colonie. Elle sait de plus que ces émigrés de Roumélie sont rien moms qu’ennemis de l’ordre et du progrès; que les Arméniens souffrent déjà trop de l’oppression des Kurdes, et que Ia presence d’un nouvel élément de désordre et de perturbation les pousserait au désespoir.

Si rien ne se fait, Excellence, pour empécher le mal qui existe, on peut au moms, croyons-nous, éviter ce qui peut aggraver Ia situation, en renouvelant ces déplorables scenes qui ont si vivement ému le public en Europe.

J’ai, &c.

(Signe) NERSES.

F. 0. 424 / 84, / 386, .No. 483